London Assembly wants T20 cricket in 2012 Olympics?
Filed Under mercialleasing.com |
pls give ur comments on this issue....
do you think that t20 is the right option???
i mean, it is entertaining, but it isn't real cricket, now is it..????
bo rude remarks pls..
cheers :)
.. There r many countries who love 2 watch cricket .n. play cricket ...
Cricket fans should also ROCK ..........
T20 is ideal for Olympics
This is our best chance ,coz England is a cricket playing country
and the birthplace of cricket.
Instances of cricket playing countries hosting Olympics in the near future will be very less coz they are very few
So this is our best chance
otherwise we will have to again wait for a long time.
4,8,12 or 16 years or so.
Edit: I agree with Bill.P also
People see much more excitement in the 20/20 game especially in countries like U.S.A., and maybe the ICC can expand its market and teams from the USA might be able to be legitimate competition for other countries.
I think London should go with this idea because
1. it is entertaining
2. ICC mite b able to expand.
Of course it is true that it may not be what many call "real cricket" but it is the only option for cricket in the olympics
There are atleast 8 Teams that can compete:
India, Pakistan, Aussies, England, New Zeland, West Indies, Bangladesh, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe, as well as other less recognized countries in cricket such as ireland, canada, kenya, bermuda.
is the shortest form of cricket.
If T20 was in the Olympics the whole world would associate cricket with T20. But for me cricket is all about tests, thats where its most interesting. ODIs are ok but T20 is really just a bit of fun (and a lot of money of late). So yeah i agree with you, T20 gives the world an artificial insight into cricket, its not real cricket
Olympic committee
I mean cricket is a very old and established sport
it is very very popular in most of the world except obviously America and i really don't see why other sports should be there and not cricket
I mean baseball is there and i don't see a single reason baseball is there over cricket
1) cricket is a big sports in many countries( England ,SA,SL,NZ aus India paki etc...)
baseball is only big in the US Canad and Japan
2)cricket has been around longer than baseball
and nobody gives me that cricket is a slow sport..crap..because (although i dont like baseball) it is pretty darn slow too
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |